Lebanon carries a heavy legacy of human rights violations—almost none of which have been addressed in a serious or transparent manner. ICTJ works with local civil society and policymakers in Lebanon on measures to address the past and strengthen the rule of law.
With a succession of interrelated wars, two parallel occupations and a string of high-profile assassinations, Lebanon carries a heavy legacy of human rights and humanitarian law violations. A Red Cross study concluded that 75% of Lebanese citizens had “personal experience” of armed conflict.
There are successive periods for which truth and accountability is being sought. The first is the 1975–1990 war, in which a wide range of local and international actors were involved. Over 100,000 civilians were killed and approximately 17,000 disappeared in this conflict.
No serious measure has been taken to address these violations, and no one has ever been prosecuted for these abuses—due to a comprehensive amnesty law passed in 1991.
Abuses continued to be committed throughout 1990–2005, and parts of Lebanon remained under occupation by Israel and Syria. Even following the Syrian Army’s withdrawal in April 2005, the country has not been able to escape its recurring cycles of violence.
The 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and a number of political and intellectual figures in a series of targeted attacks led to the establishment of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) in 2007.
Despite its value in seeking accountability for high-profile assassinations, the STL’s presence highlights the lack of justice for the tens of thousands who have also been lost to political violence in Lebanon.
The 2006 Lebanon War devastated much of the country, and the ensuing civic unrest brought the nation to the brink of internal conflict in the 2008 crisis. With spillover from the Syrian Civil War, Lebanese society and politics remain restive and engulfed in violence.
In 2008, human rights organizations and victims’ groups presented a statement to President Michel Suleiman demanding that the issue of the disappeared be made a national priority. Suleiman acknowledged the issue in his oath statement, and the cabinet pledged to address it in a serious and comprehensive manner.
However despite all assurances, Lebanese political actors continue to avoid or delay any meaningful action on - and engagement with the country’s overwhelming collective experience of violence and suffering.
ICTJ provides assistance and advice to civil society actors and policymakers working on Lebanon’s legacy of human rights violations, including forced disappearances. Our involvement aims to enable them to more effectively press government and lawmakers to take concrete steps to address these issues.
Addressing the Legacy of Conflict: In the struggle to break cycles of violence in Lebanon, ICTJ worked with its partners on a project to collect and map past violations, survey Lebanon's population's expectations of truth and justice and to analyse the consequences of impunity on society. Finally a consortium of local stakeholders and experts is to provide policy recommendations to policymakers and the general public for constructively dealing with the country’s violent past.
Truth-seeking and the Right to Know: ICTJ encourages the creation of a truth-seeking process to address the enforced disappearances that occurred during the civil war. To that end we assist local actors, civil society and families through our research and experience in their legal and public struggles for recognition and closure. Together with our local and international partners we produced and disseminated a draft law on the missing and disappeared, a key tool and anchor for continuing advocacy on the issue. Our oral history project Badna Naaref (We Want to Know) had Lebanese students engage and record their immediate families and neighbors about their personal experiences of war and violence. From the collected testimony a documentary was produced.
Understanding the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL): ICTJ works to help civil society groups better understand the STL. Based on its long-term study of hybrid tribunals, we share knowledge of how the STL operates and compares to other international and hybrid tribunals—through workshops, public lectures, and a field trip for journalists and publications. A handbook on the STL was produced in 2008.